Letter: Distressed funds still have role to play in Russia assets

News

I disagree with Patrick Jenkins’ article “Russia investors should put morals ahead of profiteering” (Opinion, March 29).

No one is advocating giving more capital to Russia-linked companies or the Russian government. Trading in the secondary market simply provides liquidity for the investors who need to depart for various reasons. Some of those investors will have become distressed themselves as a result of the war.

So, you are advocating that investors should have known that Vladimir Putin would invade Ukraine before even his own army knew and if they didn’t, then they should have no way of trying to extricate themselves from the problem.

I know of investors whose lives have been ruined by this war.

Carl George
Pivot Capital Management (Monaco)
Monaco

Letter in response to this letter:

A few crocodile tears for investors hit by the war / From Carol Wilcox, Christchurch, Dorset, UK

Articles You May Like

Solana (SOL) Starts to Retreat From Highs as Momentum Shows Early Fatigue
XRP Price Rebounds From Lows as Bulls Push Recovery Toward Key Levels
A New Era Begins: CFTC Approves Spot Bitcoin On Regulated US Markets
Bitcoin Slump Claims New Victims: Leveraged ETFs Tied To Strategy Suffer Major Losses
XRP Coils At Support: Refusal To Drop Hints At Potential Reversal Here’s Why